Project 2026
AI in Government Suitability Canvas
Asks whether a public-sector problem should be solved with AI at all, before anyone starts building.
What it is
A structured diagnostic that walks a team through the problem definition, the non-AI alternatives, the data actually available, and the feasibility and risk of the AI option. It is built to produce a defensible no as readily as a yes, which is what separates it from most AI canvases.
Reach for it when
- A team has been told to "add AI" without a problem statement
- A public body needs a documented rationale before committing budget
- An AI proposal needs comparing honestly against a simpler alternative
Running it
- Define the problem without naming a technology. If it cannot be stated that way, stop here.
- Write the best non-AI solution properly, not as a straw man. Many sessions end at this step, correctly.
- Audit the data you actually hold today, not the data you could collect. Be specific about quality, coverage and permission.
- Close on a written recommendation with its reasoning. A no with reasons is a successful outcome.
Watch out: Run after the decision to build has been made, it becomes paperwork justifying it. Its value is entirely in being run early enough to change the answer.
Comments & Discussion
Add a Comment
Recent Comments (3)
This workshop was incredibly effective for our remote team! We adapted it slightly for a virtual setting and it worked wonderfully. The key was breaking into smaller breakout rooms.
Great resource! One tip: prepare all materials the day before to avoid any last-minute rushes.
Used this for our quarterly planning session. The structured approach really helped us stay on track!