Salt to Taste

The reading

The essays the argument was made in first, and the outside work the book leans on. Every row carries a line saying why it is worth the click.

Fifteen links in three groups: what other people have already standardised, the case for writing taste down at all, and what the research actually found. These are the ones I keep going back to.

Group one

The taste-file standards

Other people have already argued about what belongs in a file like this. Read one before you write yours, and steal the vocabulary.

Group two

The argument

Why the model produces the flat thing, and why the fix is writing down what an experienced designer would otherwise infer.

Group three

The evidence

The studies underneath the claims. Two of them are the reason the book refuses to let a model grade its own work.